You must have watched a different memorial than I watched. Either that or your heart is so poisoned that you literally don’t know the difference between good and evil. Sad.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Cato Institute numbers excluded the 3,000 deaths of 9/11, celebrated by—among others—Barack Obama’s pastor, and Ward Churchill the (former) Chair of the Department of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado. (Churchill also—falsely—claimed to be a Native American, which stood him in good stead under affirmative action.).
Art , the 911 terrorists WERE far RIGHT, not liberal at all. Including them makes it about 3,600 to 65 or 60 to 1 instead of 6 to one. Do the arithmetic.
Furthermore, in order to gain support in the West these groups PORTRAY THEMSELVES in the West AS part of the leftwing anti-imperialist movement, and indeed as its spearhead, and they are ACCEPTED AS SUCH: "This is what decolonization looks like!", after Oct. 7. Or as I said, Rev. Wright and Ward Churchill (FAMOUS examples) after 9/11.
Thanks for the non sequitor. What does 9/11, Obama's pastor and Churchill have to do with the fact that Right wing terrorists kill Americans at 6x the rate of left wing terrorists. Perhaps you can't deal with the facts and are weakly deflecting from them?
If you add the 9/11 killers, celebrated as Muslim-world liberators from American imperialism by the two leftwing specific examples I cite, the "balance" looks much much different.
While a study of political violence in America could include the 9/11 deaths a focus on domestic terrorism would not since they were not citizens. Even if you include 9/11 it may change the overall percentages but still wouldnt hide the fact that right wing violence is 5x more prevalent than left wing violence.
You must have watched a different memorial than I watched. Either that or your heart is so poisoned that you literally don’t know the difference between good and evil. Sad.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Red-Green alliance struck. That’s a fact. The Islamists use “intersectionality” very effectively. It’s “woke” to accept their violence here un the US. I’ve shown it.
The Cato Institute numbers excluded the 3,000 deaths of 9/11, celebrated by—among others—Barack Obama’s pastor, and Ward Churchill the (former) Chair of the Department of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado. (Churchill also—falsely—claimed to be a Native American, which stood him in good stead under affirmative action.).
Art , the 911 terrorists WERE far RIGHT, not liberal at all. Including them makes it about 3,600 to 65 or 60 to 1 instead of 6 to one. Do the arithmetic.
Of course the Islamists could be viewed as "far right". But in fact they have had enormous support from the American LEFT as "anti-imperialists."
Furthermore, in order to gain support in the West these groups PORTRAY THEMSELVES in the West AS part of the leftwing anti-imperialist movement, and indeed as its spearhead, and they are ACCEPTED AS SUCH: "This is what decolonization looks like!", after Oct. 7. Or as I said, Rev. Wright and Ward Churchill (FAMOUS examples) after 9/11.
Thanks for the non sequitor. What does 9/11, Obama's pastor and Churchill have to do with the fact that Right wing terrorists kill Americans at 6x the rate of left wing terrorists. Perhaps you can't deal with the facts and are weakly deflecting from them?
If you add the 9/11 killers, celebrated as Muslim-world liberators from American imperialism by the two leftwing specific examples I cite, the "balance" looks much much different.
While a study of political violence in America could include the 9/11 deaths a focus on domestic terrorism would not since they were not citizens. Even if you include 9/11 it may change the overall percentages but still wouldnt hide the fact that right wing violence is 5x more prevalent than left wing violence.
Chickens coming home to roost” some people will die to protect the 2 nd amendment”. - kirk