Spot on. I would add that, in my unprofessional opinion, Trump has mental problems that are getting worst. My brother has suggested a unique spot on the autism spectrum. I agree.
I love you two and I’m so grateful that a little old lady like me of very limited means can listen to your weekly program free. I tell all my friends and anyone else who’ll listen that they’ve Got to listen to Politics Warroom. Teresa Booker from Overland Park, KS.
As is true of all Trump's ad hominems, accusations, and heinous denunciations, hidden in the projections are revealing confessions. He describes himself, his behaviors, and his desires as criticisms of the other.
He thinks in terms of hate, not disagreement, wild prevarications of self-aggrandized fantasies, not reality, and concrete absolutes, not complex logic. Sooooo, "obsessed with hating that one cannot think clearly or fairly", and deranged defined as, "unable to think or act in a normal or logical way especially because of severe mental illness : crazy or insane", the projections are clear.
I used to be a center R conserve; actually, I still am. Hating Trump is a rational position, imo. He is without any redeeming human trait. But he is a symptom of the disease, rather than its cause-and he could never have sniffed the WH but for his enablers…most importantly the L wing of the Democrat party:(
Call it whatever you want, but there’s nothing mysterious about reacting to what’s right in front of you. If a president openly mocks the disabled, treats the law as optional, and turns public office into a revenue stream, noticing it isn’t a syndrome—it’s basic pattern recognition. Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43—you could argue with them, even strongly, and still recognize the outline of public service. This is different. When character collapses, everything downstream—policy, institutions, trust—goes with it. Labeling that concern as “derangement” is just a way to avoid grappling with the obvious.
Actually the real psychological problem in on the right; TAS (Trump Addiction Syndrome)
Spot on. I would add that, in my unprofessional opinion, Trump has mental problems that are getting worst. My brother has suggested a unique spot on the autism spectrum. I agree.
Yes, I have it too, and I'm proud of it.
I love you two and I’m so grateful that a little old lady like me of very limited means can listen to your weekly program free. I tell all my friends and anyone else who’ll listen that they’ve Got to listen to Politics Warroom. Teresa Booker from Overland Park, KS.
As is true of all Trump's ad hominems, accusations, and heinous denunciations, hidden in the projections are revealing confessions. He describes himself, his behaviors, and his desires as criticisms of the other.
He thinks in terms of hate, not disagreement, wild prevarications of self-aggrandized fantasies, not reality, and concrete absolutes, not complex logic. Sooooo, "obsessed with hating that one cannot think clearly or fairly", and deranged defined as, "unable to think or act in a normal or logical way especially because of severe mental illness : crazy or insane", the projections are clear.
Just as RINOs are the MAGA fascists, the only TDS which exists is in the minds of his supporters.
Al Hunt standing up with the truth, thanks
Every follower of Jesus Christ should, unequivocally, have TDS. It is a badge of honor: https://substack.com/@kayanneriley483280/note/c-243834552?r=h1bh8&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I used to be a center R conserve; actually, I still am. Hating Trump is a rational position, imo. He is without any redeeming human trait. But he is a symptom of the disease, rather than its cause-and he could never have sniffed the WH but for his enablers…most importantly the L wing of the Democrat party:(
* conservative*
REVIEW https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00622303.pdf - DataSet 9
I've got it too.
Call it whatever you want, but there’s nothing mysterious about reacting to what’s right in front of you. If a president openly mocks the disabled, treats the law as optional, and turns public office into a revenue stream, noticing it isn’t a syndrome—it’s basic pattern recognition. Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43—you could argue with them, even strongly, and still recognize the outline of public service. This is different. When character collapses, everything downstream—policy, institutions, trust—goes with it. Labeling that concern as “derangement” is just a way to avoid grappling with the obvious.