10 Comments
User's avatar
Hound's avatar

Corporate news is corporate news and it is bad news. Whether it is fox, CBS, NBC,ABC, CNN, it is all corporate. That means they do the bidding for other corporate criminal companies such as the members of the medical mafia.

What a lot of people don’t know is that local affiliates are not owned locally. There’s a good chance or local news station is owned by a criminal company with Nazi ties known as Sinclair or heartland media who are also fascist/corporate. Corporatism is fascism.

The weather forecasters at our local station are not allowed to mention climate change.

People need to wake up and understand that we have a lot of enemies and of course Trump and the Republicans are among them but more insidious and more covert and ultimately more dangerous is corporate. Corporate is the most dangerous and entrenched enemy of democracy and civil rights. But it gets worse, social media platforms are also owned and controlled by criminals and Nazis like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Steve Balmer and Bill Gates etc.

YouTube is a huge danger to the truth. Those gangsters are now allowing dishonest and dangerous advertising which are extremely deceptive and the medical stuff is extremely dangerous. It’s far worse than that crackpot RFK Junior.

Google sanitizes truth from the Internet. From time to time see Europeans love you fines against Google criminals but in AmeriKKKa google runs rough shod over free speech by shadow banning, censoring comments and de boosting. They also control content by not allowing even certain words to be spoken on their dirty filthy fascist corporate lying platform. Not only that, Google and it’s YouTube stepchild are in violation of the antitrust laws.

The bottom line is, the news media and social media is at the mercy of fascism. Corporatism = fascism. Never forget that.

Expand full comment
Jean Conley's avatar

Excellent post, Hound. I had to realize (and say) that you're right (guess I just don't want face facts!) but you definitely are.

Expand full comment
Hound's avatar

In the American criminal justice system which includes the police in the courts civil rights are violated thousands of times a day. The people with the most power in this country are held to the absolute lowest standards. Police have something called qualified immunity which put some above the law and even above civil law. Judges have judicial immunity and prosecutors have prosecutorial immunity.

If you are being harassed by the police in America particularly if you were black and you try to assert your rights they will lock you up anyway. The prosecutor may dismiss the charges and they often do. American police have terms for this when they violate your rights. Will they beat the crap out of somebody they call it tuning them up. When they start laying false charges on it person they call it hemming them up. American police will arrest people that they know are innocent and they know they will have their charges dismissed. The saying they have for that is, “you may beat the rap but you won’t beat the ride.

Sometimes they actually lose their qualified immunity and end up getting sued and all that sounds really good, it’s the taxpayers who end up footing the bill for dirty cops.

And now we have ICE kidnapping people because of their dark complexion. America has become a police state and it was happening long before Donald Trump came along.

Expand full comment
Jean Conley's avatar

Absolutely.

Expand full comment
Robin Howe's avatar

Boycott CBS (Cruddy Bull Shit)

Expand full comment
Deborah Bayer's avatar

It’s going to be a watered down Fox. But the NYT coverage of the war in Venezuela has been not much better. No analysis of the issues but lots of cheering for the skilled effectiveness of America’s fighting forces. Reminds me of the Times’ shameful reporting of the invasion of Iraq.

Expand full comment
David Gillanders's avatar

Who wrote this? They desperately need an editor.

Expand full comment
Maryellen Collins's avatar

Who wrote this? It’s riddled with typos, misspellings and poor grammar.

Expand full comment
John Mattson's avatar

BUT I would wager neither of you grammar monitors had any trouble understanding it. Or did you? Or do you care? Or do you simply disagree but cannot refute it any other way?

Expand full comment
Dank Soft's avatar

Chinese Bot

Expand full comment